REVIEW ARTICLE
PEER BULLYING AS A STRATEGY FOR ACHIEVING INDIVIDUAL GOALS
IN THE LIGHT OF SOCIAL DOMINATION AND COERCIVE ACTIONS STUDIES
1
Akademia Pedagogiki Specjalnej im. Marii Grzegorzewskiej w Warszawie
Publication date: 2019-07-21
Corresponding author
Aleksandra Tłuściak-Deliowska
Aleksandra Tłuściak-Deliowska, Akademia Pedagogiki Specjalnej im. M. Grzegorzewskiej w Warszawie, Wydział Nauk Pedagogicznych, Instytut Pedagogiki, ul. Szczęśliwicka 40, 02-353 Warszawa, e-mail: adeliowska@aps.edu.pl, tel.: 22 589 36 00 wew. 3436
Aleksandra Tłuściak-Deliowska, Akademia Pedagogiki Specjalnej im. M. Grzegorzewskiej w Warszawie, Wydział Nauk Pedagogicznych, Instytut Pedagogiki, ul. Szczęśliwicka 40, 02-353 Warszawa, e-mail: adeliowska@aps.edu.pl, tel.: 22 589 36 00 wew. 3436
Rozprawy Społeczne/Social Dissertations 2017;11(2):7-13
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
The aim of this paper is to analyze the strategic side of the peer bullying phenomenon. The
starting point for considerations is the observation that more and more authors and researchers
in this area come to the conclusion that the behaviours of bullies are clearly instrumental and
planned. The text justifies the need for shifting emphasis in the overview of the phenomenon by
focusing particularly on the issue of social dominance and the function of aggressive behaviours
as well as a review of empirical study that provide (direct and indirect) evidence to support
these assumptions. At the end, the concept of coercive actions developed by James T. Tedeschi
and Richard B. Felson is mentioned, through which instrumental aggression occurring in
bullying can be explained.
REFERENCES (30)
1.
Cook C.R., Williams K.R., Guerra N.G., Kim T.E., Sadek S. (2010), Predictors of bullying and victimization in childhood and adolescence: a meta-analytic investigation. School Psychology Quarterly, 2(25), s. 65-83.
2.
Farnicka M., Liberska H., Niewiedział D. (2016), Psychologia agresji. Wybrane problemy. PWN, Warszawa.
3.
Garandeau C.F., Cillessen A.H.N. (2006), From indirect aggression to invisible aggression: A conceptual view on bullying and peer group manipulation. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 11, s. 612-625.
4.
Hawley H.P. (1999), The ontogenesis of social dominance: a strategy-based evolutionary perspective. Developmental Review, 19, s. 97-132.
5.
Hawley H.P., Little T.D., Card N.A. (2007), The allure of a mean friend: Relationship quality and processes of aggressive adolescents with prosocial skills. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 31, s. 170-180.
6.
Juvonen J., Graham S. (2014), Bullying in Schools: The Power of Bullies and the Plight of Victims. Annual Review of Psychology, 65, s. 159-185.
7.
Komendant-Brodowska A. (2014a), Agresja iprzemoc szkolna. Raport ostanie badań. Analizy IBE/01/2014, Warszawa.
8.
Komendant-Brodowska A. (2014b), Grupowe uwarunkowania przemocy szkolnej. Niepublikowana rozprawa doktorska, Uniwersytet Warszawski, Warszawa.
10.
Maccoby E. (2004), Aggression in the context of gender development, W: M. Putallaz, K.L. Bierman (eds.), Aggression, antisocial behavior and violence among girls. The Guilford Press, New York, s. 3-22.
11.
Olthof T., Goossens F.A., Vermande M.M, Aleva E.A., van der Meulen M. (2011), Bullying as strategic behavior: Relations with desired and acquired dominance in the peer group. Journal of School Psychology, 49, s. 339-359.
12.
Olweus D. (1993), Bullying at school: What we know and what we can do. Blackwell Publishing, Malden, MA.
13.
Olweus D. (2010), Przemoc w szkołach. Prezentacja na Europejskim Kongresie Przeciwdziałania Przemocy Szkolnej, Warszawa, 15.09.2010.
14.
Pellegrini A.D. (2008), The roles of aggressive and affiliate behaviors in resource control: A behavioral ecological perspective. Developmental Review, 28, s. 461-487.
15.
Pepler D.J., Craig W. (1995), A peek behind the fence: Naturalistic observation of aggressive children with remote audiovisual recording. Developmental Psychology, 31, s. 548-553.
16.
Prinstein M.J., Cillessen A.H.N. (2003), Forms and functions of adolescent peer aggression associated with high levels of peer status. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 49, 3, s. 310-342.
17.
Pyżalski J. (2012), Agresja elektroniczna i cyberbullying jako nowe ryzykowne zachowania młodzieży. Oficyna Wydawnicza „Impuls”, Kraków.
18.
Salmivalli C., Lagerspetz K., Bjorkvist K., Osterman K., Kaukiainen A. (1996), Bullying as a Group Process: Participants Roles and Their Relation to Social Status within the Group. Aggressive Behavior, 22, s. 1-15.
19.
Salmivalli C., Peets K. (2009), Preadolescents’ peer-relational schemas and social goals across relational contexts. Social Development, 18, s. 817-832.
20.
Sijtsema J.J., Veenstra R., Lindenberg S., Salmivalli C. (2009), Empirical test of bullies’ status goals: assessing direct goals, aggression and prestige. Aggressive Behavior, 35, s. 57-67.
21.
Sutton J., Smith P.K., Swettenham J. (1999), Bullying and theory of mind: A critique of the social skills deficit view of anti-social behavior. Social Development, 8, s. 117-127.
22.
Tedeschi J.T., Felson R.B. (1994), Violence, aggression & coercive actions. American Psychological Association, Washington.
23.
Tłuściak-Deliowska A. (2013a), Zaangażowanie gimnazjalistów w przemoc rówieśniczą. Rola bliskich przyjaźni. Wychowanie na co Dzień, 6(237), s. 3-7.
24.
Tłuściak-Deliowska A. (2013b), Deklaracje postaw wobec przemocy rówieśniczej wśród gimnazjalistów. Psychologia Rozwojowa, 18(3), s. 75-86.
25.
Tłuściak-Deliowska A. (2014), O wykorzystaniu i użyteczności analizy sieci społecznych w badaniu przemocy rówieśniczej w szkole. Teraźniejszość - Człowiek – Edukacja, 3(67), s. 147-159.
26.
Tłuściak-Deliowska A. (2016), Moralność i bullying. Edukacja charakteru podstawowym elementem w rozwiązaniu problemu dręczenia rówieśniczego w szkole? Studia z Teorii Wychowania, 7, 1 (14), s. 169-193.
27.
Vaillancourt T., Hymel Sh., McDougal P. (2003), Bullying is power: implications for school-based intervention strategies. Journal of Applied School Psychology, 19, s. 157-176.
28.
Volk A.A., Dane A.V., Marini Z.A. (2014), What is bullying? A theoretical redefinition. Developmental Review, 34, s. 327–343.
29.
Wysocka E. (2013), Agresja w młodym pokoleniu – teoretyczne i empiryczne egzemplifikacje. Pedagogika Społeczna, 2(48), s. 115-136.
30.
Xie H., Swift D.J., Cairns B.D., Cairns R.B. (2002), Aggressive behaviors in social interaction and developmental adaptation: A narrative analysis of interpersonal conflicts during early adolescence. Social Development, 11, 205-224.
| eISSN: | 2657-9332 |
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
