ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Searching for a common discursive space between the natural and social sciences by using of analogy
More details
Hide details
1
Zakład Systemów Produkcji i Środowiska, Instytut Zootechniki – Państwowy Instytut Badawczy, Polska
Submission date: 2025-07-29
Acceptance date: 2025-11-19
Publication date: 2025-12-30
Corresponding author
Kamila Magdalena Musiał
Zakład Systemów Produkcji i Środowiska, Instytut Zootechniki – Państwowy Instytut Badawczy, Polska
Rozprawy Społeczne/Social Dissertations 2025;19(1):378-386
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Abstract: The need for discourse, and polemics in science is evident across many
disciplines. The aim of this paper was to identify selected interpretations of biological
strategies within social sciences, based on reasoning through analogy. Material and methods: Method of analogy may support discovery of new ways to expand
evaluative frameworks of distinct scientific disciplines. This study compares certain
assumptions to examine whether theoretical debate across different fields of knowledge
facilitates emergence of shared conceptual ground. Results: Economics, classified as social science, has from its early stages drawn analogies
to natural processes. A field of inquiry where these two domains may intersect is
evolutionary economics. This is because various human behaviors in the economic sphere
can be related to mechanisms that occur naturally in the biological world. Conclusions: Evolutionary economics may provide a platform for interdisciplinary
discourse, based on assumption that economic development, like nature, is subject to
continuous transformation governed by principles of natural selection.
REFERENCES (40)
1.
Bańska, A. (2002). [Social environmental psychology]. Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar (in Polish).
2.
Bartkowiak, R. (2008). [History of Economic Thought]. Polskie Wydawnictwo Ekonomiczne (in Polish).
3.
Biegański, W. (1913). [The fourth form of reasoning by analogy]. Polskie Towarzystwo Filozoficzne (in Polish).
4.
Biela, A. (1989). [Analogy in science]. Wydawnictwo PAX (in Polish).
5.
Bołdyrew, A. (2009). [The reception of T. R. Malthus’s population theory in Polish social thought at the turn of the 19th and 20th centuries.]. Studia z Historii Społeczno-Gospodarczej XIX i XX Wieku, 6, 7-31 (in Polish).
https://doi.org/10.18778/2080-....
6.
Brzeziński, M., Gorynia, M., Hockuba, Z. (2008). [Economics and other social sciences at the beginning of the 21st century. Between imperialism and cooperation]. Ekonomista, 2, 201-232 (in Polish).
7.
Ciszek, M. (2020). The philosophy of perceiving the human environment from the perspective of environmental social psychology and environmental sociology (Implications for sustainable environmental and health security). Problemy ekorozwoju, 15(2), 211-222.
8.
Darwin, K. (1959). [On the Origin of Species. Selected Works. Volume 2]. Państwowe Wydawnictwo Rolnicze i Leśne (in Polish).
9.
Dąbrowski, I. K. (2011). [The classic and evolutionary concept of the enterprise after the mortgage crisis]. Studia i Prace Kolegium Zarządzania i Finansów SGH, 108, 48-57. (in Polish).
10.
Falińska, K. (2010). [The implications of Darwin’s theory of natural selection for plant population studies]. W: K. Zarzycki, Z. Mirek i U. Korzeniak (red.), [Charles Darwin in the eyes of Polish botanists of the 19th-21st centuries]. Wydawnictwo Instytutu Botaniki im. W. Szafera PAN (in Polish).
11.
Fisher, R. A. (1930). The genetical theory of natural selection. Oxford University Press.
12.
Gecow, A. (2014). [The importance of description and explanation in the Biological Turn. The perspective of purposeful information in biology and the humanities as the basis for memetics]. Teksty z Ulicy, Zeszyt memetyczny, 15, 27-40 (in Polish).
13.
Grobler, A. (2006). [Scientific methodology]. Wydawnictwo Aureus i Znak (in Polish).
14.
Hardt, Ł. (2015). [On the limits of economics]. W: Ł. Hardt i D. Milczarek-Andrzejewska (red.), [Is economics beautiful? A book dedicated to Professor Jerzemu Wilkinowi]. Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar (in Polish).
15.
Johnson, M. (2007). The meaning of the body: aesthetics of human understanding. Wydawnictwo University of Chicago Press.
16.
Justyński, I., Justyńska, J. (2012). [History of socio-economic thought]. Wolters Kluwer (in Polish).
17.
Kaczmarek, K. M. (2013). [The mechanism of religious evolution]. Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM (in Polish).
18.
Kałążna, K., Rosicki, R. (2013), [Power, struggle, territory, population – from natural sciences to political sciences]. W: B. Kaczmarek (red.), [Metaphors of politics. Volume 4]. Elipsa (in Polish).
19.
Keynes, J. M. (1956). [General theory of employment, interest, and money]. Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN (in Polish).
20.
Krokos, J. (1997). [“Lexicon of Classical Philosophy,” ed. Józef Herbut, Lublin 1997: [review]], Studia Philosophiae Christianae, 34(1), 145-146 (in Polish).
21.
Kwaśnicki, W. (1996). [Evolutionary economics – an alternative view of the economic development process]. Gospodarka Narodowa, 10, 1-35 (in Polish).
22.
Kwaśnicki, W. (2001). [Zygmunt Heryng’s logic of economics]. Gospodarka Narodowa, 10, 83-100 (in Polish).
23.
Kwaśnicki, W. (2009). [Is the financial crisis contributing to a crisis in economic science?]. Studia Ekonomiczne, 3-4, 239-254 (in Polish).
24.
Kwaśnicki, W. (2021). The role of diversity and tolerance in economic development. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 31, 821-851.
25.
Lakoff, G., Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh: the embodied mind and its challenge to western thought. Basic Books.
26.
Mayr, E. (1998). [This is biology]. Wydawnictwo Prószyński i S-ka (in Polish).
27.
Milczarek-Andrzejewska, D. (2014). [Issues of power in economics based on the example of the agri-food sector in Poland]. Wydawnictwo Instytutu Rozwoju Wsi i Rolnictwa Polskiej Akademii Nauk (in Polish).
28.
Miłkowski, M. (2011). [Biology as a detailed science and a specific science]. Przegląd Filozoficzno-Literacki, 2-3(31), 9-17 (in Polish).
29.
Musiał, K. (2023). Relativity of Environmental Sustainability Illustrated by the Red Queen Hypothesis. Problemy Ekorozwoju, 18(1), 170-176.
30.
Musiał, W., Musiał, K. (2021). [The use of analogy to search for common areas of knowledge in biology and economics]. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Rolniczego (in Polish).
31.
Nęcka, E. (2005). [Creativity training]. Gdańskie Wydawnictwo Psychologiczne (in Polish).
32.
Piekiełko-Zemanek, A. (1983). [Botanical observations during the voyage of the Beagle]. Wszechświat, 84(5), 101-106 (in Polish).
33.
Rypel, A. (2017). [Educational discourse from a processual-cognitive perspective]. Kultura-Społeczeństwo-Edukacja, 2 (12), 9-35 (in Polish).
35.
Szafer, W. (red.). (1959). [The flora of Poland. Volumes 1-2]. Wydawnictwo PWN (in Polish).
36.
Szarski, H. (1997). [An outline of history and an attempt to assess the current state of evolutionism]. W: H. Krzanowska (red.), [An outline of evolutionary mechanisms]. Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN (in Polish).
37.
Weiner, J. (1999). [Life and evolution of the biosphere]. Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN (in Polish).
38.
Wilkin, J. (2014). [Do economists need philosophy?] Wydawnictwo Instytutu Rozwoju Wsi i Rolnictwa Polskiej Akademii Nauk (in Polish).
39.
Włodarczyk, J. (2012). [Evolutionary economics – an overview of the issues]. W: S. Czaja, A. Becla, J. Włodarczyk i T. Poskrobko (red.), [Challenges of contemporary economics. Selected issues]. Wydawnictwo Difin (in Polish).
40.
Zalega, T. (2015). [Evolutionary economics as one of the trends in contemporary economics – an overview of the issues]. Studia i Materiały Wydział Zarządzania Uniwersytet Warszawski, 19, 157-177 (in Polish).
http://doi.org/10.7172/1733-97....