PL EN
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
The differences in life satisfaction between individuals following plant-based diets and those consuming animal products
 
More details
Hide details
1
Wydział Psychologii, Uniwersytet Kazimierza Wielkiego w Bydgoszczy, Polska
 
 
Submission date: 2023-02-26
 
 
Final revision date: 2023-06-25
 
 
Acceptance date: 2023-06-26
 
 
Publication date: 2023-08-22
 
 
Corresponding author
Mateusz Dominik Nesterok   

Wydział Psychologii, Uniwersytet Kazimierza Wielkiego w Bydgoszczy, Jana Karola Chodkiewicza 30, 85-064, Bydgoszcz, Polska
 
 
Rozprawy Społeczne/Social Dissertations 2023;17(1):97-113
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Abstract: This article presents the results of research on the impact of diet on the level of life satisfaction. The results show that people following a plant-based diet exhibit a higher level of life satisfaction than meat-eaters. The findings indicate a positive impact of a healthy and balanced plant-based diet on mental health. Material and methods: The study was conducted on 332 individuals using the Life Satisfaction Questionnaire by Jochen Fahrenberg, adapted by Jan Chodkiewicz. The research sample was collected randomly using the snowball method. Results: Analysis of participant responses confirms the hypothesis that people following a plant-based diet achieve statistically significant higher overall life satisfaction scores than omnivores, and higher scores in certain factors when compared to them. Conclusions: Diet is crucial for life satisfaction and affects behaviors, emotions, and self-perception. This should motivate us to make conscious dietary choices and modify those harmful to our health.
 
REFERENCES (25)
1.
Boldt, P., Knechtle, B., Nikolaidis, P., Lechleitner, C., Wirnitzer, G., Leitzmann, C., Rosemann, T., Wirnitzer, K. (2018), Quality of life of female and male vegetarian and vegan endurance runners compared to omnivores – results from the NURMI study (step 2), pobrane z: https://www.researchgate.net/ publication/326454326_Quality_of_life_of_female_and_male_vegetarian_and_vegan_endurance_runners_compared_to_omnivores_-_results_from_the_NURMI_study_step_2/fulltext/5b4e8d8a0f7e9b240fe8a387/Quality-of-life-of-female-and-male-vegetarian-and-vegan-endurance-runners-compared-to-omnivores-results-from-the-NURMI-study-step-2.pdf.
 
2.
Campbell, T. (2011), Nowoczesne zasady odżywiania. Przełomowe badanie wpływu żywienia na zdrowie, Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Galaktyka.
 
3.
Chodkiewicz, J. (2009), Adaptacja polska Kwestionariusza Zadowolenia z Życia (FLZ), Studia Psychologiczne, 47 (3), 5–21.
 
4.
Cliceri D., Spinelli S., Dinnella C., Prescott J., Monteleone E. (2018), The influence of psychological traits, beliefs and taste responsiveness on implicit attitudes toward plant– and animal–based dishes among vegetarians, flexitarians and omnivores, Food Quality and Preference, 68, 276–291.
 
5.
Corfe, B., Owen, L. (2017), The role of diet and nutrition on mental health and wellbeing, Proceedings of the Nutrition Society, 76, 425–426.
 
6.
Dhont, K., Hodson, G. (2014), Why do right–wing adherents engage in more animal exploitation and meat consumption?, Personality and Individual Differences, 64, 12–17.
 
7.
Diener, E. (2006), Guidelines for national indicators of subjective well–being and ill–being, Journal of Hapiness Studies, 7 (4), 397–404.
 
8.
Esselstyn, C., Ellis, S., Medendorp, S., Crowe, T. (1995), A strategy to arrest and reverse coronary artery disease: a 5–year longitudinal study of a single physicians practice, The Journal of Family Practice, 41 (6), 560–568.
 
9.
Esselstyn, C., Favaloro, R. (1998), Introduction: more than coronary artery disease, The American Journal of Cardiology, 82 (10), 5–9.
 
10.
Fahrenberg, J. (2000), Fragebogen zur Lebenszufriedenheit. Handanweisung, Gottingen: Hogrefe–Verlag.
 
11.
Forestell, C., Spaeth, A., Kane, S. (2012), To eat or not to eat red meat. A closer look at the relationship between restrained eating and vegetarianism in college females, Appetite, 58, 319–325.
 
12.
Hardcastle S., Thøgersen–Ntoumani C., Chatzisarantis N. (2015), Food Choice and Nutrition: A Social Psychological Perspective, Nutrients, 7 (10), 8712–8715.
 
13.
Jollife, N., Archer, M. (1959), Statistical associations between international coronary heart disease death rates and certain environmental factors, Journal of Chronic Diseases, 9 (6), 636–652.
 
14.
Kasprzak, E. (2012), Zadowolenie z życia jako kategoria emocjonalna i poznawcze, Polskie Forum Psychologiczne, 1/2012, 187–199.
 
15.
Keys, A., Menotti, A., Aravanis, C., Blackburn, H., Djordevic, B., Buzina, R., Dontas, A., Fidanza, F., Karvonen, M., Kimura, N. (1984), The seven countries study: 2,289 deaths in 15 years, Preventive Medicine, 13 (2), 141–154.
 
16.
Koszowska A., Dittfeld A., Zubelewicz–Szkodzińska B. (2013), Psychologiczny aspekt odżywiania oraz wpływ wybranych substancji na zachowania i procesy myślowe, Hygeia Public Health, 48 (3), 279–284.
 
17.
Larrieu, T., Layé, S. (2018), Food for Mood: Relevance of Nutritional Omega–3 Fatty Acids for Depression and Anxiety, Frontiers in Physiology, 9 (1047).
 
18.
Maidon D., Stasiuk K. (2017), Psychologia konsumenta, Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
 
19.
Mills, M. (1996), The Comparative Anatomy of Eating, pobrane z: http://adaptt.org/documents/Mi... (10.05.2021).
 
20.
Nezlek J., Cypryańska, M., Forestell, C. (2020), Dietary similarity of friends and lovers: Vegetarianism, omnivorism, and personal pelationships, pobrane z: https://www.researchgate.net/p... (10.04.2021).
 
21.
Nezlek, J., Forestell, C. (2020), Vegetarianism as a social identity, Current Opinion in Food Science, 33, 45–51.
 
22.
Ormish, D., Brown, S., Billings, J., Scherwitz, L., Armstrong, W., Ports, T., McLanahan, S., Kirkeeide, R., Gould, K., Brand, R. (1990), Can lifestyle changes reverse coronary heart disease? The Lifestyle Heart Trial, Lancet, 336 (8708), 129–133.
 
23.
Şengül, P., Kasten, E. (2018), The influence of plant–based nutrition and level of oestrogen on life satisfaction, World Nutrition, 9 (3), 241–253.
 
24.
Strack, F., Argyle, M., Schwarz, N. (1991), Subjective well–being: an interdisciplinary perspective, Oxford: Pergamon Press.
 
25.
Wilthley C., Gunderson R. (2016), Public receptiveness to policies promoting plant–based diets: framing effects and social psychological and structural influences, Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 20, 45–63.
 
eISSN:2657-9332
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top